if you are given just one option to solve the overpopulation then what would it be?
| give your thoughts about overpopulation too like is it a myth or is it becoming a real problem sooner or later for now i choose empowering women, give women education and better economic opportunities other than being a child making machine then see the birthrate decline naturally just like whats happening to rich countries now a days going to space seems more tempting (terraforming planets, building space colonies gundam style) but the world economy is bad right now so not much world wealth to fund big space projects like that i think |
| You do know Overpopulation isn't everywhere and Whites are underpopulated. Empowering women is not good for our countries, and I'm sick of you talking about overpopulation as if it's a problem everywhere. |
| you forgot to mention the lesbian option smh shit's viable |
+ both sides of the beat smoke rings in the heat slow grind for the woke shes down as a smoke how to shine by the dealer cosign for your feeling bitch to grind on my beat |
| Force people to watch anime and make them realize that 2D >>> 3D |
 What's the difference? |
Nyu said: You do know Overpopulation isn't everywhere and Whites are underpopulated. Empowering women is not good for our countries, and I'm sick of you talking about overpopulation as if it's a problem everywhere. well people on the forums are more sick of you talking about feminism from the looks of it lol that can be part of empowering woman like feminism lol |
Gholy said: Overpopulation isn't an issue in the West. If anything we (the West) should be having more children. It's sad to see women have almost a dozen sexual partners by the time they reach age 30 but never have children. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Countries_by_Birth_Rate_in_2014.svg i know like i said rich countries like the west empowers women so that naturally reduces birthrates there |
Gholy said: isekai said: "Empowering women" was a mistake and we're paying dearly for it. i know like i said rich countries like the west empowers women so that naturally reduces birthrates there why? i thought i heard some right wing people say that lowering the population of a country is a good way to make everyone there economically happy, since there will be more wealth distributed for each citizen if the population is low do that worldwide then that will make poverty (and not just extreme poverty) be solve too? |
isekai said: Gholy said: "Empowering women" was a mistake and we're paying dearly for it. why? i thought i heard some right wing people say that lowering the population of a country is a good way to make everyone there economically happy, since there will be more wealth distributed for each citizen if the population is low do that worldwide then that will make poverty (and not just extreme poverty) be solve too? The population is lowered for Whites, but the Third Worlders in our country have higher population growth, so there will still be poverty, but Whites will become a minority in their own nations as well. |
Nyu said: isekai said: why? i thought i heard some right wing people say that lowering the population of a country is a good way to make everyone there economically happy, since there will be more wealth distributed for each citizen if the population is low do that worldwide then that will make poverty (and not just extreme poverty) be solve too? The population is lowered for Whites, but the Third Worlders in our country have higher population growth, so there will still be poverty, but Whites will become a minority in their own nations as well. there is immigrant workers in your rich countries because it helps your economy grow, cheap labor that immigrant workers provide is gold for capitalism economy that rich countries popularize honestly the main problem of slow growth in rich countries now a days is because of crony capitalism and right wing economic policy of trickle down economics which does not work even IMF (international monetary fund) says |
isekai said: Nyu said: The population is lowered for Whites, but the Third Worlders in our country have higher population growth, so there will still be poverty, but Whites will become a minority in their own nations as well. there is immigrant workers in your rich countries because it helps your economy grow, cheap labor that immigrant workers provide is gold for capitalism economy that rich countries popularize honestly the main problem of slow growth in rich countries now a days is because of crony capitalism and right wing economic policy of trickle down economics which does not work even IMF (international monetary fund) says Immigrant workers just take jobs from the population. cheap labour is bad for the people, as it lowers the wages. Anyway your point has nothing to do with the topic, that overpopulation isn't an issue in the West, and empowering women is bad. |
| @Nyu you cannot stop globalization as long as profit making (capitalism) from things like trade exist rich countries exploit and buy/trade natural resources on poor countries for cheap to enrich their own country anyway making this poor countries economically grow just enough to increase their birthrate sadly because to this poor people having more children means more money in the future, so what if this poor countries empower their woman more too? that will be good for the world right? |
Nyu said: isekai said: why? i thought i heard some right wing people say that lowering the population of a country is a good way to make everyone there economically happy, since there will be more wealth distributed for each citizen if the population is low do that worldwide then that will make poverty (and not just extreme poverty) be solve too? The population is lowered for Whites, but the Third Worlders in our country have higher population growth, so there will still be poverty, but Whites will become a minority in their own nations as well. I don’t think that’ll happen anytime soon. And @isekai I personally don’t think there is any good solution. All of them have their own problems imbedded within. Space is limitless, so it prolly is the best for long term survival but at the price of short-term economic issues (or long-term who knows. Economy is weird). |
| "Empowering women was a mistake." Phew, never change MAL. |
| Space travel, we need that technology badly. Also, the 1st and 2nd world countries are overpopulated unless you live in Japan or Taiwan where it's becoming the opposite. Feminism did not depopulate society, right now it can't when it consists of rich whiners destroying each other. |
 |
Gholy said: isekai said: Try telling that to the politicians and corporations who use that as an excuse to bring in migrants (inb4 "it's good for the economy"). The people in charge aren't going to let that happen. why? i thought i heard some right wing people say that lowering the population of a country is a good way to make everyone there economically happy, since there will be more wealth distributed for each citizen if the population is low do that worldwide then that will make poverty (and not just extreme poverty) be solve too? Please no. What "works" for one country doesn't necessarily work for every country. Also I wouldn't really consider our situation a success because "female empowerment" is fucking up our perception on sex and marriage and it'll only get worse from here.well like i said to Nyu crony capitalism and trickle down economics is whats more the problem there in rich countries like USA though cheap labor coming from immigrant workers is good for capitalism there in rich countries and also ye empowering woman will lead to modern feminism (female supremacy) but thats the price you pay for a better economy/capitalism history shows trade won for making all countries rich How to Enrich a Country: Free Trade or Protectionism? |
isekai said: @Nyu you cannot stop globalization as long as profit making (capitalism) from things like trade exist rich countries exploit and buy/trade natural resources on poor countries for cheap to enrich their own country anyway making this poor countries economically grow just enough to increase their birthrate sadly because to this poor people having more children means more money in the future, so what if this poor countries empower their woman more too? that will be good for the world right? You can stop Globalisation, if the people finally wake up. And empowering women should only happen in the third world, not the developed world. |
N30-R3TR0 said: Nyu said: The population is lowered for Whites, but the Third Worlders in our country have higher population growth, so there will still be poverty, but Whites will become a minority in their own nations as well. I don’t think that’ll happen anytime soon. And @isekai I personally don’t think there is any good solution. All of them have their own problems imbedded within. Space is limitless, so it prolly is the best for long term survival but at the price of short-term economic issues (or long-term who knows. Economy is weird). Whites will be a minority in America in twenty years. And Europe just got millions of migrants. |
Nyu said: isekai said: @Nyu you cannot stop globalization as long as profit making (capitalism) from things like trade exist rich countries exploit and buy/trade natural resources on poor countries for cheap to enrich their own country anyway making this poor countries economically grow just enough to increase their birthrate sadly because to this poor people having more children means more money in the future, so what if this poor countries empower their woman more too? that will be good for the world right? You can stop Globalisation, if the people finally wake up. And empowering women should only happen in the third world, not the developed world. and how will you stop globalization? so you do not believe in gender equality i take it? you think women should more be child making machines like in the past? |
Nyu said: isekai said: @Nyu you cannot stop globalization as long as profit making (capitalism) from things like trade exist rich countries exploit and buy/trade natural resources on poor countries for cheap to enrich their own country anyway making this poor countries economically grow just enough to increase their birthrate sadly because to this poor people having more children means more money in the future, so what if this poor countries empower their woman more too? that will be good for the world right? You can stop Globalisation, if the people finally wake up. And empowering women should only happen in the third world, not the developed world. That won’t happen. People like money. A vast majority won’t wake up. Also I don’t know if you mean empower to the point of inequality or empower to the point where women are equal to men. If it’s the latter then I disagree. I don’t see anything wrong with that. |
Nyu said: N30-R3TR0 said: I don’t think that’ll happen anytime soon. And @isekai I personally don’t think there is any good solution. All of them have their own problems imbedded within. Space is limitless, so it prolly is the best for long term survival but at the price of short-term economic issues (or long-term who knows. Economy is weird). Whites will be a minority in America in twenty years. And Europe just got millions of migrants. Just b/c whites will be less than 50% of the population (I’m assuming this is what you mean), that does not mean they are a minority. For example If there are 30% whites, 20% Mexican 20% African 20% Indian and 10% Peruvian ppl then whites are still in the majority. Edit: I’m aware of Europe’s situation. I was thinking about the USA mainly, sorry |
isekai said: Nyu said: You can stop Globalisation, if the people finally wake up. And empowering women should only happen in the third world, not the developed world. and how will you stop globalization? so you do not believe in gender equality i take it? you think women should more be child making machines like in the past? When nationalist movements spring up, the migration crisis has already set the foundation, give it ten years, and Europe will be embroiled in Nationalism. I believe in treating women equally, however, I don't believe that white people should become minorities for the sake of that. There are also major problems that come from an underpopulated nation, like Germany and Japan are facing. N30-R3TR0 said: Nyu said: You can stop Globalisation, if the people finally wake up. And empowering women should only happen in the third world, not the developed world. That won’t happen. People like money. A vast majority won’t wake up. Also I don’t know if you mean empower to the point of inequality or empower to the point where women are equal to men. If it’s the latter then I disagree. I don’t see anything wrong with that. People are already starting to wake up in Europe, if White Americans knew they were becoming minorities, they would get quite nationalistic. I'm confused about the second part of your post. |
| use it for soylent green. |
N30-R3TR0 said: Nyu said: Whites will be a minority in America in twenty years. And Europe just got millions of migrants. Just b/c whites will be less than 50% of the population (I’m assuming this is what you mean), that does not mean they are a minority. For example If there are 30% whites, 20% Mexican 20% African 20% Indian and 10% Peruvian ppl then whites are still in the majority, Majority means 50% or more. And whites made up 90% of the population in 1940, so Whites becoming a minority in America is morally wrong. |
Nyu said: isekai said: and how will you stop globalization? so you do not believe in gender equality i take it? you think women should more be child making machines like in the past? When nationalist movements spring up, the migration crisis has already set the foundation, give it ten years, and Europe will be embroiled in Nationalism. I believe in treating women equally, however, I don't believe that white people should become minorities for the sake of that. There are also major problems that come from an underpopulated nation, like Germany and Japan are facing. N30-R3TR0 said: That won’t happen. People like money. A vast majority won’t wake up. Also I don’t know if you mean empower to the point of inequality or empower to the point where women are equal to men. If it’s the latter then I disagree. I don’t see anything wrong with that. People are already starting to wake up in Europe, if White Americans knew they were becoming minorities, they would get quite nationalistic. I'm confused about the second part of your post. If you mean empower women so much that women > then men, then I agree with you. Women shouldn’t be better than men. We should be equal. However, if you mean women shouldn’t be equal to men, then I disagree with you. Also I said most won’t wake up. As long as the profiteers are around, then globalization will continue. I think it can be slowed but not to the point of extinction |
Nyu said: N30-R3TR0 said: Just b/c whites will be less than 50% of the population (I’m assuming this is what you mean), that does not mean they are a minority. For example If there are 30% whites, 20% Mexican 20% African 20% Indian and 10% Peruvian ppl then whites are still in the majority, Majority means 50% or more. And whites made up 90% of the population in 1940, so Whites becoming a minority in America is morally wrong. Majority literally means “the bigger number.” Using my example, the bigger number is 30 (whites) which is not 50% Also why is that morally wrong? Are you against multiculturalism? |
N30-R3TR0 said: @isekai that’s a good video. I might add that protection leads to distrust in the economy. Then nobody invests in materials from other countries, or if they do they gotta throw an absurd amount of money away for no reason other than ego. It hurts everybody. yep, and with protectionism economy the prices of goods will become higher there on a nationalist country too free trade makes prices of goods cheap for everybody as long as its not some premium products (artificial high pricing) like those iPhones |
| Death lottery. Whoever gets picked dies. |
╮ (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.) ╭ |
N30-R3TR0 said: Nyu said: When nationalist movements spring up, the migration crisis has already set the foundation, give it ten years, and Europe will be embroiled in Nationalism. I believe in treating women equally, however, I don't believe that white people should become minorities for the sake of that. There are also major problems that come from an underpopulated nation, like Germany and Japan are facing. People are already starting to wake up in Europe, if White Americans knew they were becoming minorities, they would get quite nationalistic. I'm confused about the second part of your post. If you mean empower women so much that women > then men, then I agree with you. Women shouldn’t be better than men. We should be equal. However, if you mean women shouldn’t be equal to men, then I disagree with you. Also I said most won’t wake up. As long as the profiteers are around, then globalization will continue. I think it can be slowed but not to the point of extinction I believe in Equality, as long as it isn't harming population growth. N30-R3TR0 said: Nyu said: Majority means 50% or more. And whites made up 90% of the population in 1940, so Whites becoming a minority in America is morally wrong. Majority literally means “the bigger number.” Using my example, the bigger number is 30 (whites) which is not 50% Also why is that morally wrong? Are you against multiculturalism? Majority literally means 50% or more. It does not mean bigger number. It is morally wrong because (in the case of Europe) these are our lands, and we shouldn't be turned into minorities in our own lands. Multiculturalism is bad. isekai said: @Nyu nationalism that means your economy there should be protectionism? history shows that free trade won in enriching all countries so globalization wins Free trade is fine, but there is no need for our nations to be invaded, borders can be closed to immigration. |
Fuchsia said: Death lottery. Whoever gets picked dies. That story was pretty terrible imo. |
 The best way to solve any problem.;; |
| Make porn illegal. Install monitoring devices on everyone to go off whenever they say a dirty word, so they can be arrested immediately. |
| One-child policy, also people keeping some sort of specific hopes for their future child should not be allowed to have one in the first place. |
 |
| @Nyu >Free trade is fine, but there is no need for our nations to be invaded, borders can be closed to immigration. easier said than done, cheap human labor and geniuses/experts/specialists are part of resources that are traded too the only political policy that i can think of that kinda hinders this good without worsening economy of a nation is merit based immigration system and politicians in USA are discussing about this already |
| Offer the third world aid in exchange for getting sterilized. The portion of those populations that would take that option would tend to be the lowest IQ, and so you'd end up helping those countries to stand on their own feet in the long run. |
Altairius said: Right Wing Death Squads Ehm, just passing by.Offer the third world aid in exchange for getting sterilized. The portion of those populations that would take that option would tend to be the lowest IQ, and so you'd end up helping those countries to stand on their own feet in the long run. |
 |
Ratohnhaketon said: Altairius said: Right Wing Death Squads Ehm, just passing by.Offer the third world aid in exchange for getting sterilized. The portion of those populations that would take that option would tend to be the lowest IQ, and so you'd end up helping those countries to stand on their own feet in the long run. What my colleague here means to say, naturally, is Right Wing Humanitarian Squads. What we advocate is clearly the most humane option, in the long term. |
Fuchsia said: Death lottery. Whoever gets picked dies. Should that be held every year or every second? |
| In theory eventually we'll become smart enough to stop killing each other for lack of elbow room and hit up Mars with a couple nice oceans and forests and stuffs. |
| Vasectomies - shooting blanks isn't so bad - |
More topics from this board
» Cleaning your room hurts the economyvasipi4946 - Today |
19 |
by deg
»»
8 minutes ago |
|
» What are your favorite urban legends? And which local ones do you know?ImNotAnOtaku1 - May 22 |
9 |
by xthewarwithinx
»»
14 minutes ago |
|
» The captcha doesn't just work for the bots, it also effect people that are drunk or hightsukareru - Today |
10 |
by xthewarwithinx
»»
35 minutes ago |
|
» Do you ever wish the internet would go back 20 years?ImNotAnOtaku1 - May 22 |
42 |
by traed
»»
2 hours ago |
|
» Favorite places in Japan(to thos who have been to Japan) and where would you like to visit in the future when you go again?KiraraFan - May 7 |
45 |
by GinIonSui
»»
3 hours ago |