This story is weird.
Franz Bonaparta is one of the most twisted minds I've ever encountered in fiction.
I think the mistake here, and the aim of the author, Bonaparta, is to get the reader to somehow relate to the story. It's what makes them so creepy and their message so powerful (and evil). There is double reasoning behind his choice to write "children's books", after all: Children's books like this are known to contain a message, meaning, or exhortation about life, which is what makes people (including adults) attempt to relate the book to themselves in some manner. Also, children are particularly susceptible to this sort of suggestion; it has a teaching or molding effect on them. The meaning of the book is very likely to be accepted by a child as true, which is why these are so dangerous.
Therefore, tackling how this supposedly relates to Johan, Anna, Tenma, or anyone else is a mistake, in my opinion. It's like trying to build a building from the top down. First we need to figure out the meaning behind these stories, and after that we can speculate how this meaning might have affected Johan, Anna, or others. Depending on how Tenma relates to it, at that point we can also speculate what the overall thematic goal of Monster is.
I think the first book is easier to pick apart. I've come up with some meanings, the latter portion of which I believe to be the correct one (meaning the one the show is using). The first interpretation is that greed consumes endlessly; no amount of things will ever satisfy you because you'll just want more things. It's not a bad meaning, but I think it neglects the presence of the devil. A demon or the devil is a powerful depiction of evil, so its inclusion must be important. I think the key here is the end result of both farmers: One wished they had committed the evil act, and one wished they had not, but they both were left in a terrible state. I think this ending implies that it does not matter whether one commits evil or not, that it doesn't change anything. "Both farmers were the same".
Needless to say, I heavily disagree and dislike the book on multiple levels, especially since it was being taught to children, but it continues further.
The second book's meaning seems to open itself to more interpretation, partly because we haven't heard the ending, but are lead to draw our own conclusions. Whether the book itself continues from there or not, I don't know. However, given what we have, here's what I think: The "god of peace" is supposed to be a picture of good or righteousness. However, when it looks at itself, it sees evil. This is implying that good and evil depend only upon perspective, and not upon character, actions, etc., meaning there is no such thing as good and evil in the first place. The "god of peace" and the "devil" are supposedly the same.
Again, I could not disagree more, but such meanings could explain Johan's lack of morals. The thing is, in removing the distinction between good and evil, these books are promoting evil. They are drawing the children toward it, as if it were okay. I think this is partly why Johan self-identified with the Monster in "The Monster Without a Name". His natural inhibitions were being suppressed by the other books. That he had a twin he could view as his "good half", or an extension of himself, only made matters worse and pushed him into further darkness.
I noticed someone mention multiple personality disorder before, and I mentioned before that the story could also be implying something more literal with all the talk of monsters and devils (and the Biblical quote at the beginning of the series). I think this could still be viewed in either manner if we assume Franz Bonaparta had the same problem as Johan. In removing Johan's natural inhibitions, he passed on his demons to his son, whether you see that as being figurative or literal.
...
What a disturbing story Monster is.
Edit: Oh yeah, because I was so busy talking about the story, I almost forgot to mention how amazing the OST in Monster is. Particularly that scene where Anna is about to open the door in the Red Rose Mansion was given a lot of intensity thanks to the OST, though the rest of the episode also showcases it well. |